Details
-
Aboutaspiring engineer, striving musician and programmer
-
Skillscurrent focus: Python, HTML, CSS, JS, Swift, C++ other focus: Java, C#, Ruby
Joined devRant on 2/12/2020
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
-
@webketje "now" as in "as I age", yes
-
wait hold on, i have a couple things to say about this:
1) don't worry too much about other peoples' perception of you, it isn't important when you're looking to make rational decisions.
2) when it comes down to making decisions, don't listen to your gut all the time, you need to *think* about it. you need to find a plan and create steps to achieve it.
3) if you're clueless, you need a vision or idea of what you want for yourself.
4) if you're absolutely unsure, you need to start with having larger goals and slowly breaking them into chunks.
5) you need to know yourself at least a little well to know what you are and aren't ok with. if you aren't, that's a problem and should be fixed, and you need to discover who you are - what your wants and dislikes are, what you will and will not "tolerate", etc. -
we're expected to help the reader understand extreme difficulty without using large chunks of code? sometimes, not possible.
although, i will argue that efficiency is important and huge chunks of code can be confusing for non-programmers. -
facts
-
yes i agree with the others on this, don't give up, at least not until you've assessed and analyzed each problem thoroughly enough to the point where it doesn't seem to be working - maybe you're overthinking it.
personally, whenever i encounter a problem of such difficulty, i simply break it down into smaller chunks and further analyze. once done, i put it all together like done for a sentence. -
@moonxash we all have at some point. starting to think this is just how we're wired
-
@PonySlaystation good one
-
@emma699 that's ok, gl with it
-
@PonySlaystation good to know, I didn't manually add those. i suppose that's what happens when you use type in the section titled "tags"
-
@C0D4 thank you, intrigued to know what this so called "circus" entails
-
great view & computer
-
@emma699 epic!
-
pretty good, you?
-
@emma699 interesting project, care to share?
-
it's more so an active attack bc you are actively engaging online - though engaging typically means to be active
-
@Root actually, it's more efficient than convenient
-
@Root yes i am aware, it's really convenient. i shall do it
-
@Demolishun true but that's too confusing and inconvenient
-
@Demolishun possibly could have a negative connotation to it?
-
@0xdevshm yes, and i reacted to it
-
worthy of recognition*** bad grammar
-
some of the comments we make are valid and noteworthy of recognition
-
@electrineer hate is a strong word, just bummed about not being able to like your own comments.
-
@connormon understandable. there's always that extra push we need to give ourselves
-
@connormon how were they?
-
@Root thank you, glad to be here
-
@Floydimus i disagree with the first part you said, what purpose does addressing someone as such serve?
-
@PonySlaystation thank you though
-
relatable
-
@PonySlaystation have been here for quite sometime, just haven't posted until now