Details
-
AboutOld Git. Remembers when "keep it simple, stupid" was a thing.
Joined devRant on 3/16/2023
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API

From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
-
Most of maths and physics, and by implication most of everything.
Women. Humans. Body language, facial expressions etc.
Marketing.
How anyone could think a language with significant whitespace is easy to use. -
This morning, copilot is really keen for me to insert a secret it found in the local .env file into as many places as possible.
So I start typing process.env.API_K...
Hey! I've got a great idea! I found the key when I was going through your stuff! Let's put it in the code as a hard-coded default in case the environment variable is blank! Aren't I a clever robot!
How about no, you fucking great penis. -
> she works in a hospital
So b2 has finally decided to see a shrink? About bloody time.
Giving the patient candy to earn his trust is a good move, and the fact that he is merely fantasising about kissing her and nothing more explicit suggests that his delusions may be reducing in intensity. -
What a load of cobblers.
If you're running a brothel, don't beat about the bush, just come out and say it. -
https://youtube.com/watch/...
-
@Lensflare So singles and doubles tennis (1-tuples and 2-tuples) are straightforward enough: to get the probability that the ball is returned you sum up the probability that each player returns the ball, over the set of n players. Generalising that to n-tuples is simple.
But what if, instead of summing over a set of n players, we integrate over a path of length z in complex space?
I'm not sure what comes next though. -
This reminds me of the time I tried to come up with rules for mixed n-tuples tennis, and then tried to further generalise it to z-tuples for complex z.
I might have to revisit that, actually. -
Life right now, in the wise words of Patches O'Houlihan, is like watching a bunch of retards trying to fuck a doorknob.
-
Stop putting random stuff up your Aristotle, where do you expect it to go?
-
Two fruits? What's your entropy source?
-
I have never performed cunnilingus on anyone from New Zealand.
-
Also spherical geometry can be a slippery fish.
-
Shit, isn't it.
On the positive side, in the afterlife you will be presented with every recruiter who has ever ghosted you, and a massive rubber cock. -
I have always struggled to take anyone with the title "Scrum Master" seriously.
-
@kiki He should be pleased to be in the non-Gill category given what Eric was into.
-
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
-
And font designers are divided into Eric Gill and everyone else.
-
There seems to be a gap in the market for AI-enabled kitchen mixers.
If only I knew how to sell things to people. -
@cafecortado Now that he's disappeared, the rest of us need to provide more dad jokes.
-
Don't try to sell stuff. Especially not if it's a low-code/no-code mobile app dev platform.
-
Wait, you're not @kiki...
-
@Lensflare They've been waiting for the 17th record to insert since 2018.
-
If you can make one shaped like a cock and balls then you've got a sale.
-
What is the significance of those two \u2010 characters in amongst the normal minus signs?
-
I think "arse".
-
@cafecortado WOTD: ultimater.
-
Madness. That setup where you scan the qr code on the table and order and pay without having to talk to anyone is the way to go.
-
@Root I can't be doing with spiders generally.
-
@lorentz Slowest?
foreach (var c in new[] { " and ", columnExpression, " like ", valueExpression }.SelectMany(x => x)) filter.Append(c); -
More realistic:
p1: I need to you roll a dice for me.
p2: OK, give me the dice.
p1: No, first you have to tell me what the score's going to be.
p2: I haven't even seen the dice yet, it could be anything.
p1: You can at least give me an idea, I need it for this spreadsheet.
p2: Alright, I'll be surprised if it's less than 1 or more than 6.
p1: Come on, everyone else is taking this seriously, why can't you?
p2: Ffs. Ok, it's going to be a 4.
p1: Thank you, that wasn't so hard now was it? Here's the dice.
p2: Wait, this is one of those joke dice with sex positions on it.