@spoiledgoods if it was so easy then being a developer would be a joy all the time. Instead there are moments in which it becomes a nightmare. You say that it's as esasy as changing the tools. Well there are a lot of reasons for not doing so. The more obvious is that you are not in control of all the technology stack. The second is that this job is all build around knowledge. When you invest in knowing something, switching to something else requires to put in the same amout of effort, time etc. And if more people are involved you have to multiply for the number of people. There are a lot of products that are not particularly good but they have a huge investment on them. Think of office for example. When the tool you invested into lets you down is quite painful.

@donkulator The question is: what do you do in those cases.

however Netbeans seems to be much more stable than eclipse.

Solution:

dotnet nuget add source https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json -n nuget.org

@agox I considered several overcomplex solution before trying to come up with mine. The effort here is to crate the most compact, easy to remember possible solution. The key is $? variable; this allowed me to overcome the sort of bizzarre desgin that a 'Test-*' function does not return 'fail' but an error when it fails. This in turn makes it difficult to trace the failures by simply piping the output since when in error there is no output. Funny design.

Hi folks. I come up with a solution that is easy enough to be remembered. (Making simple things simple should be PS designer's job. Yes. If you are a PS designer please notice how hard it is doing usefull stuff with your programming API). However here it is. for(;;) { Test-Connection 192.168.1.10; ac test.txt "$($?) $(Get-Date)" }

@ScriptCoded Have you got a solution that you can go on a server and **remember it** without developing an application for that only (simple) purpose? Please share it!

object pipeline is actually powerful and in windows you can connect to anything. However i've already ranted about powershell, but it's about classes & modules

@magicMirror I was looking for understanding :-) :-D. By the way it happens to me to use vba more than i would like to.

@siggi It's a great idea! Only I don't think I'll have other commands. But it worth considering.

@Ranchonyx StackOverflowAsyncWriter

@hack There is nothing as a 'View' here, but ViewModel

@EmberQuill it's a good general rule. In this case, the initial name is already long (ViewModelCollection) and actually yes, they are completely separated classes in the sense that they make the same things in different ways. This in turn seems the golden use case of inheritance, not parametrization.

@SortOfTested <ProjectTypeGuids>{60dc8134-eba5-43b8-bcc9-bb4bc16c2548};{FAE04EC0-301F-11D3-BF4B-00C04F79EFBC}</ProjectTypeGuids>
and in particular FAE04EC0-301F-11D3-BF4B-00C04F79EFBC
seems to mean: C# application.
The available options seem to be written in the registry.
The first is the "WPF flavor"
https://stackoverflow.com/questions...
But I do question the choice of guids for such information.

@Root tnx, how can I change it now?? cant find the edit? can i edit?