The game you're thinking of is Black & White.

I feel personally attacked.

@Nanos
- "So what makes you interested in this position?"
- "I don't fancy starving to death very much".

@Azoth128 to be honest I have yet to dive deep into any large codebases.

@Azoth128 nope, I really enjoy it.

I love refactoring stuff like this. Its fairly easy, and oh so satisfying. Like scratching an itch you didn't know you had.

I love refactoring.

Good on you!

Writing "update" as a commit message is a fireable offense.

I'm in the process of moving from a small company to a bigger one.

@MarioC gotta have tests, so you can go fast.

@ArchLinux it's when you don't refactor your temporary code, so the project becomes more difficult to manage over time.

I have a few issues with your code:

Don't use var anymore, use const/let.

Why redeclare all App variables, when it's short anyway, and just creates extra clutter.

If you still want all those from App, use destructuring instead.

@DodgerAkame that's why you use polymorphism instead.

There are quite a few WTF things built into javascript, but overall it's not nearly as bad as people make it out to be.

I feel like the servers wouldn't agree with the moisture...

At least it has tabs now.

@rant1ng if something is "not immediately obvious to most", it's a good sign you should go with the obvious one instead.

Good luck!

Shouldn't be a problem unless your code is a mess.

I think the reason is so you don't leave the cable in the mouse all the time, thus rendering the wirelessness(?) moot.

At my company we all use the same password for absolutely everything.

My boss thinks remembering passwords is a waste of time.

This why you never talk behind the back of people.

Or work on a branch, push small changes, then merge once you're done with the thing .

Don't let your clients walk all over you, or they will never learn.

You explained the situation and he didn't listen, so just go home and optimize those images tomorrow. For an extra fee.

Sounds like quite the character.

@destriaero
I do use Typescript, and perhaps that's the reason I find things like this out of the ordinary.

@host127001
Well, it depends. For the DOM, like in the OP's example, you should be able to get the editor to help you out

And for the rest you can use jsdoc comments, which allows many editors to reason about your javascript.

If your editor doesn't make a red squiggly when trying to access things that don't exist, you need to look over your tooling.

@Hu-bot0x58 yes, that's the general idea.