I am supposed to replace a Mathematics teacher (France) for a scratch class.
Believe me, it's the only time I'll open up this brain virus. Seriously, back then we were doing Fortran, Pascal and C! (ok not fortran i'm only 34 NOT 1223)

Void Linux. Good distro. But I switched back to Arch.
1. XBPS takes too much time
2. Consumes too much resources
3. Not enough packages.
Bye.

Now they're calling and EEPROM programmer a hacking device. What a sad world.

You may use any distro. But against one enemy we all unite : Microsoft

You already know PascalCase vs camelCase but now get ready for... CAPITAL ASSEMBLY vs lowercase assembly.

"You're a real programmer only when you first encounter a segfault"
I had the most demotivating segfault in my life. Every functions in my project returns a segfault, except the one to init and create a window. I/O. Audio. Frame Buffers. Everything. AAAH.
It is on glX (X11) so i'm planning to remove it's support and instead work on WASM then use Electron to render those apps on X11 and rpi.

MS developers be like : "Ye we are working on Windows. Ya we are the best devs in the US"
But in fact, they pass more time otpimizing ads number seen by user rather than actually fixing bugs and doing a great OS

I am on Void Linux XFCE, and I recently discovered a pre-installed Sublime Text. I ran it, and saw how fast it was compared to my pure NeoVim (no plugins, no theme) ! I only have 2 gigs of RAM and a very old Pentinium, and lightweight programs is a necessity. As I saw it's speed, I started using it on WIndows too, and it was way better than CLion (no plugins, no theme, all optimizations on). I had on ST 34 plugins.

Now, here is my question : Why so much hate on Sublime Text ? Even without paying 70 bucks, een if it's not OSS, it's very good.

Windows users be like : "YAY I REALLY PREFER WINDOWS OVER MACOS BECAUSE IT HAS ADS IN THE START MENU"

MacOS users be like : "YAY I prefer MacOS over Windows because it's beautiful and simple"

GNU/Linux users be like : "YAY I REALLY PREFER GNU+LINUX OVER ANYTHING BECAUSE IT LETS ME EDIT WHATEVER I WANT"

BSD users be like : ""

Microsoft. Ah, microsoft. That excellent company that made Windows. Ah, Windows, that excellent OS that it's team made WinAPI. Ah WinAPI. That excellent API that has WinMain. Ah W- FUCK WINMAIN IT RUINS EVERY PROJECT SERIOUSLY WINMAIN WINAPI GO FUCK URSELF HEY WINDOWS TEAM REFACTOR RECODE OR WATHEVER YOUR API AHHH

The only good thing about VISUAL STUDIO is it's tools (Developer console and Powershell).

I use GNU/Linux.
Roommates use MS/Windows. Virgin slanders.

WHY DID FEDORA REMOVE X11 !!! Really a bad decision from FESCO(fedora decision committee).
X11 is by a kilometer and a half (mile I think) away from Wayland and it's ugly do::from syntax that I always hated from CPP and RS.
X11 has simple basic functions and a good manual (https://tronche.com/gui/x/xlib/) well documented.

Compiling CMake w/ cmake on Ubuntu. I need C23 standard, this distro ships with CMake-0.000.ALPHA

(not that I don't use Ubuntu but for Github Codespaces, it sucks)

Really why using systemd ? Honestly, it sucks.

I don't really understand all that love rust gets. It's syntax, better than C++'s, isn't better than C syntax.
You can make memory safe programs with C, just if you know how to manage memory, and you should only if you know how to. Bigger ecosystem for C/C++.
C23 waay better than any rs standard.

PS: I used both C/C++ and Rust

I just switched to void from arch, dunno why. It is really cool and has runit. And XBPS is actually 3x faster than Pacman. And I have 1Gb of ram, Arch used 950Mb BSPWM, Void 300 with XFCE.

Really a good distro

Microsoft > Linux

WinAPI.

I just compare WinAPI ans WASAPI(audio) and you just remark the technical background : one is shitty and old as hell and the other intuitive, simple, developer friendly and well implemented.