Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
b2plane63741y@Tamrael what if the only ones who can produce (sell) content are the Creators, while the only ones who can consume (buy) content are the Fans?
Now you can see how there are gonna be quite a few attributes that the Fans are Never gonna have.
How would you structure models now? -
b2plane63741y@Nanos the biggest difference i forgot to mention is the case where Creators can only create content while Fans can only consume and buy content. Now you can see how both of them might not ever need to have some specific attributes
-
b2plane63741y@Nanos the fans will NEVER be able to become creators. Once you make a fan account you have decided you only want to consume and spend
-
@b2plane why limit it like that? I can't think of a good engineering reason, but I can think of lots of edge cases where people would want to do both
-
I would make every account a fan and a creator. Like YouTube. And most people just won't touch the upload button.
-
I'm not familiar with the system, but bear in mind they may not use a relational db at all - these days a lot of data is denormalized and stored in key value document stores.
It means you end up likely duplicating a view of data all around the place wherever you need fast access of it - but you gain easy scaling, replication and very fast lookups no matter the size. -
b2plane63741y@lungdart it doesnt matter why it works like that. Tell me how you would model the system i described
-
ars140651yAny user stuff I always do something like
User (generic shit like name, email, password) with its own is
Then add other tables
Creator (userId PK FK)
Fan(userId PK FK)
Admin (userId PKFK)
Etc.
Works fine, though I’m no dba so I’m sure there are better options. And of course it depends on your requirements, but I find it very flexible. -
b2plane63741y@ars1 is the User table supposed to be created separately or should it be ignored and it's attributes passed down to its superclass who inherited it and create those tables instead (fan creator)
-
I read the first line and i knew it had to be you. Only one person on this app who would be interested in understanding how onlyfans works !
Lowkey, i love how you are using all the devs here as your free-of-cost advisors posing them as questions. -
@b2plane look up data normalization. It's the theory behind creating stable data schemas
Lets take onlyfans system for example. They have fans and creators. How is database models supposed to be structured? Whats the correct way.
1) a User model that contains all users of all roles, but differentiates them by Role ENUM
2) a separate Fan and Creator model, each having their own unique attributes, while each extending an abstract base User model class that has all the common attributes that both models should use
The 1st approach is simple but gets very large and difficult to maintain and view all the attributes cluttered in 1 class. Not to mention how some attributes will never be used for a user who registered as a Fan.
2nd approach is more modular and easier to understand and maintain by knowing exactly what attributes to put for each model. However problems occurs when you try to join tables and stuff start to become overengineered
rant