Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3274b/3274b64c24289803149af173f6ef6770c13ead86" alt=""
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
I’ve had that argument before as well, concluded that water is not wet as using the word wet in that context is nonsensical. I still feel pretty good about that conclusion, but I’m open to arguments lol
Just to give an example, you wouldn’t say fire is burnt -
@alexbrooklyn @Plasticnova water is NOT WET.
I dont care if I'm the new guy and also the only one defending that position in the office- water is not wet.
I could go on about this all day -
@Plasticnova fire is plasma, however the object sustaining the fire IS burnt
In similar fashion, the water's surface is recursively infinitely covered in water so its infinitely wet
Related Rants
>first time working for big tech company
>first couple days with no sudo, cant setup environment :(
>however
>first couple days mostly debating new peers on if water is wet
>verynice.jpg
rant
nice
new job