After a whole weeks working, I understand that developing a responsive html email for outlook is something totally different with doing the same thing for other mail boxes.

did you use foundations framework zurbs email stack?

https://foundation.zurb.com/emails/...

it makes it easy to do responsive emails even for outlook.

@heyheni I thought the same, but even with that you still will find stuff where you have to implement workarounds for Outlook.

That is Microsoft's stupidity: Hey, we have two browser engines, and are currently porting Edge to the Chromium engine, so the proper thing to do is of course to use Word to render HTML-mails in Outlook.

@heyheni thx! I'm really tired with those' table↘tr↘td' things.However, my task has done for this moment.Still much thx.

Responsive EMAIL?! WTF?

Who came up with such an idiocy?

If your target audience is primarily business fucking forget outlook. Reason: it uses fucking word as a rendering engine. You have to build with tables, forget the frameworks they don’t fucking work properly in outlook. Get your 90s tables for layout coding brain out. Until you get rid of outlook completely responsive emails is a fucking pipe dream. Fuck Microsoft.

@helloworld I totally would like to forget Outlook, but:
The company we do HTML-Mails for is using Outlook+Exchange as email-system and they won't accept mails that won't work on their systems.
The target audience for the mails are primarily musicians and they seem to either use Outlook or Apple Mail. Hell, they even use IE, the site they use as portal has a share of about 10% for Internet Explorer.

@ddephor no idiocy, it's normal. Every newsletter is responsive.

Try MJML

https://mjml.io

@heyheni It is madness, you can attempt a faux responsive but you have to still use tables if you need to target outlook.