Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Lol, so accurate.
I tend to run away from books with titles like "Basics of *". Had a basics of inorganic chemistry textbook. It took me months to get through the first few chapters. -
Well.. that's a very big nut or the in depth is a bigger on the inside 🤔 * flies away in a tardis*
-
That C# in Depth book is by Jon Skeet, I'll doubt many things but I'll never doubt that Jon Skeet is the biggest expert on C#.
-
asgs115636yAmazing picture!
I have zero knowledge of C#. But Skeet's book has updates till v5. So unless the versions 6 and 7 added more features which the other book covers, something is definitely off 🤔 -
Sefie16576yWell. It seems like it's easier to dig yourself a hole in C# than to make it very short and concise.
-
Maybe the Nutshell book has a lot more examples, bigger text, larger margins?
The In-depth book can be less verbose, more quick-paced, with eye-straining font size ;-) -
cst199221166y@TempestasLudi I think the answer is in "The Definitive Reference". It's a reference book. And, of course, it's O'Reilly.
-
TheShell3056yJust like some people: seem to be a big deal on the surface but are a lot less when you get to know them in depth.
-
asgs115636yThe more I think about it, I feel that we have forgot the fact how "deep" the books are. We are missing the 3rd dimension here
Related Rants
Something's not right.
joke/meme
developer
coding
programming
coder
c sharp
programmer
c#