Some data scientists are like fucking first year baby devs and I've just got to try to be nice and hold their hand and not scream....

You mean python devs?

@Lensflare mostly probably 😁 Python dem language for sience dawg! Python will figure out in the end that climate is doing fine 😎 Also, didn't you mean snek++?

@Lensflare fuck you, I use type annotations and shit. I'm also a c++ dev too. They've got huge ass comments explaining what the code does, like legit 50 dashes, a line saying this loads data, another 50 dashes then a COMMENTED OUT load line that has been replaced elsewhere. It was added and removed by the same person in the same block of work I'm currently reviewing, so I just see this useless block has been added.

@atheist I‘m sorry, I didn‘t mean to insult you, but your answer is somehow funny as hell! 😂

@Lensflare DO YOU SEE WHY I'M FRUSTRATED NOW?! I'm not paid enough to baby people

I've so far spent half a day reviewing this and have only got as far as style yet..

The worst thing is I'm in a different department and no idea what seniority this person is so I don't know if I can just tell them to change shit and know they'll actually listen or not. I'm reviewing because I rewrote it previously after another data scientist did a load of god awful code (worse than this).

python devs are not real devs, as I keep saying

@jestdotty what do I need to do to earn your approval? 😜

@atheist there is only one way to proof you're a true dev in these dark days. It is:
int main(int argc, char *argv[]){
unsigned int the_number = (1337 + 420) * 42;
return 0;
}

@atheist what would an approval from a js dev even be worth?

@Demolishun fuck, even used unsigned to be sure. Expected to be enough.