well folks

another classic case of teaching the interviewer something during the interview

and still not getting the job

that's enough, i've had it

the world is filled with fucking dumbass clowns

their reason: "you don't have enough experience with X, Y, and Z."

even though the interview was filled with questions only about A, B, and C.

what are we doing here folks

Interviews are 75% luck, you just have to keep drawing until you get one. But damn do they suck.

The interviewer decide if you join the company by how you look(discrimination is rampant) and how you fit into the legacy system development and not complain about the code very much.

Corporate doesn't like competent Devs because they might become annoying and demand actual pay

@Tonnoman I do agree. When you end up teaching them something in the interview they may think - Holy crap this dude knows what he's talking about. If we hire him he may attempt to take charge and optimize things making our efforts look futile. We don't need that so we will hire some dumb kid who we can train and pay less.

@retoor Better give him a joint, so he can homeless and hungry both.

For smaller companies it’s common to hire people from a field no one at the company has a clue about. These companies try to innovate and the new employe is supposed to fill in that knowledge gap.

@lastNick If they know anything about anything, they can come up with 15 minutes worth of questions they actually understand.