Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
				++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
				Sign Up
			Pipeless API
 
				From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
				Learn More
			Comments
		
- 
				
				 Huuugo24848y@LeoRiether @nyxmc only because you can doesn't mean you should! Your one-liners take double the time to read, are hard to extend and are very error-prone. Huuugo24848y@LeoRiether @nyxmc only because you can doesn't mean you should! Your one-liners take double the time to read, are hard to extend and are very error-prone.
- 
				
				Wait what?
 
 Where is sheep array defined prior to calling length on it? Also like others mentioned why run out of sheep by having a finite number.
 
 Also why start two counters at 0 just to increment them both at the same rate numberOfSheeps will always be equal to i in which case using i in the loop is pointless.
- 
				
				That loop is not optimized.
 Tell him to use ++i instead of i++ to avoid creating one unnecessary object












Coming out the test today. There is a message from the Professor in the back of the test.
undefined