Do you think your i5/i7 has any sense of how underutilised it is?

With the amount of migrations I run, no 😉

Sometimes doing 3D renders for 24 Hours straight so I think it's happy when I code and it isnt maxed out :P

@Atlas I see where you're going, but the problem is a lot of stuff is not really good to parallelize and on most non performace relevant stuff programmers don't even care to implement it for parallel execution...

@quine welcome to devRant

go create an avatar for your self

@qbasic16 First: Wrong. And the right term is "concurrent". Its more difficult to program, but if done right, it can be faster. Our whole world is concurrent.
Second: YES! Most just wont give a fuck. And this is bad, because our CPUs have more than one cores for over 14 years now.

@vortexman100 What exactly do you mean with wrong? 😉

@qbasic16 "A lot of stuff is not really good to parrelilize [...]" Most stuff can be made with a concurrent design. Of course there are some who cant, but for most there is a way. I recommend Rob Pikes talk about concurrency vs parrellelism.

@vortexman100 Ok, yeah that's totally true. I should probably have used a more specific quantifier.