Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
qqJS797yBefore anyone says "Just use React", I love React, but you can't always choose your stack at work. :(
-
Ready11847yWell...the previous version is called angular 1. The new version is simply called angular.
-
qqJS797y@Ready Yeah, Angular >=2 "should" be referred to as Angular. And Angular 1 "should" be referred to as AngularJS. But look at this image and tell me if the most important guy in the room, Google's search engine, agrees.
And so, you have to google by explicitly noting the version. Even if you google "Angular 4 _____", you'll find more AngularJS than you would like.
Related Rants
-
byt3cod323Stages of learning angular js 1. Wtf 2. I think I get it. 3. Wtf
-
diegovincent37Hi, I am a Javascript apprentice. Can you help me with my project? - Sure! What do you need? Oh, it’s very...
-
mkdirLuci412Maintaining software built by interns who have all quit by now and made zero documentation
Googling for Angular (>=2) documentation and finding AngularJS instead feels like cancer.
If Google was going to "update" to what is functionally a new framework, they should've named it differently instead of trying to piggyback on the popularity of AngularJS. Sure, there's similarities, but let's be realistic here.
undefined
angular
angularjs
documentation fail