Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
![](/static/devrant/img/pipeless-devrant-banner-white.png)
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
A permission level worthy of leadership should replace buttons with the name-cards of people who are responsible for the thing and therefore should have agency over it.
-
you should have "shadow-view-only"
pretends that the setting was changed but ignores it.
that's worthy of leadership. -
cprn16512y@Midnight-shcode That's a real thing. Long time ago I fucked up as a junior and a whole compliance department was reading from a prod db but writing to a replica. Nobody noticed for 2 years. Finally I did and it turned out the diff between those two dbs can be easily automated. So I did automate it and proclaimed a great victory of making their lives so much easier. Then the whole department got reduced to 1 person.
Related Rants
-
boombodies15Manager: We need to setup the security in the Mexico server Dev: You mean that 3rd party firewall add on? Ma...
-
boombodies26Manager: Why arenβt you working? Dev: I am, Iβm just not typing because Iβm thinking an issue out. Man...
-
boombodies19Manager: How come the intern does way more tickets than you? Dev: Because you told me to only give him the ea...
Meeting with CEO went well I heard. Only thing he didn’t like that there was no permission level “worthy of leadership” (GUI options are view-only/worker/admin/super).
Keeping the existence of the the secret “god” permission to myself I proceeded to create the “executive authority” permission, which is an alias…
…for view-only. πππ
rant
management logic
garbage collection
executive authority