Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
@RazorSh4rk Java might work, but it does so like a pile of shit
C# actually is readable and the code more predictable -
@RazorSh4rk they actually are imo
I don't know why you insist on using explicit get/set functions though. It's not like you couldn't use them in C# too. -
@Krokoklemme if you tried to run my c# code with javac, it would probably run, im talking about the built in functions and how i can never find what im looking for. Also msdn is a piece of junk
-
@RazorSh4rk what built-in functions? Do you mean the generated getters and setters for properties?
And I don't know how you manage to not find things, considering the class structures are kinda similar.
And let's not talk about documentations. They always suck, including MSDN and Oracles docs
Related Rants
-Yeah sure, I'll adjust to java pretty quickly. Have been working with C# for years.
Narrator- But little did he know that how much Java differs.
undefined
java c#