Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Company I work for (non IT) has a history with using Excel for almost everything, from "Databases" to downright Wikis which in part is responsible for my taking up peogramming.
-
@IntrusionCM I think, columns can be created so as to meet 1st normal form pretty quickly :)
-
@stackphish not (entirely) true.
or better: devil is in the details.
The first normal form says that non atomar attributes must be resolved.
You could add columns, yes.
But a worksheet of excel must not contain explicitly one table.
As far as I know you could only reference a cell range in excel and a worksheet.
Hence - to have a definement of a relation which is necessary to fulfill the requirements that _all_ attributes (as in every attribute in all relations) you have this lil trouble of ending up with a half fulfilled requirement.
If you could define that one worksheet, which can be uniquely adressed, must only contain one table.... Then you would have a strict fulfillment of the first NF.
Afaik a worksheet name is unique, even by name. -
mundo0349793yI had this conversation with a data scientist on LinkedIn, the guy kept telling me excel is a db because you can query it an import it to R or python.
I kept saying you can di the same thing with a csv, a text file or XML and that doesn't make them databases.
The guy didn't budge, even after accepting XML isn't and me dropping the bomb: Excel is a glorified XML bitch. -
mundo0349793y@IntrusionCM i hate to tell you this, but you can query fields from.ither workbooks too.
If you try hard enough, you xan have a relational diagram mapped and working on excel files.
As long as it is for reading only and the data is clean, you can make it work. -
neel-basu303yI never used excel as a database. But what is the technical argument here?
No indexing No database? -
@mundo03 Yes. I'm aware of it.
It's too warm here... But that was my point.
When looking at normalization and databases, you need to see the normalization as a full concept.
In order to have a "relation" in excel, you need to have a worksheet and this worksheet must contain exactly one table.
Then you could create a database.
Whole file - one database
Worksheet - one table
Table
If you'd stick multiple tables into one single worksheet, you will not have a unique relation.
If you stick only one table in one worksheet, it works
Related Rants
I don't consider people serious who still believe that excel is a database!
rant
daily byte