Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Marketing, that's why; selling to impulsive buyers means 'koolr' names, bigger specs.
-
Most people wouldn't compute that 7:3 is more widescreen than 16:9. They'd compare it to 4:3 and still consider 16:9 bigger. So, yeah, marketing mainly.
-
@aki237 Being prime numbers, 7 and 3 feel wrong to me. 14:6 would be nice, however.
-
lkeude96908y21:9 looks wider than 16:9 so calling it 7:3 would probably be confusing. For example we have 3:2 < 4:3 < 16:9 < 21:9.
Im probably just rambling lol -
Cranio76208yBecause less math-inclined people can compare 21:9 and 16:9 very rapidly and with less confusion.
7:3 could seem "less wide" than 16:9 to the average Joe.
Related Rants
Why isn't 21:9 simply called 7:3
undefined
aspect ratio