Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
kyokid4098yYou would still need to transfer it on the device you want it to be, so redo your math.
-
anon8114948yI can't think of any single files being near 10 petabytes...!?
Thats like 250,000 BluRay movies...! -
drRoss49148yIn badly connected counties, this is actually a thing. Quicker to ship it with a device to another location than to transfer it over the internet.
Especially if it means the company loses less money from reduced downtime. -
Grumpy28878yIn an article about the SETI project, I read a quote "never underestimate the bandwidth of a truck loaded with half inch tapes".
-
ggromx4368yI actually once saw a video of a company with two offices in a city with terrible internet.
They actually trained pigeons to carry USBs.
I can't tell if it was a joke or a real thing but I found it hilarious. -
@ggromx you should check out RFC1149 - IPoAC : https://ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt/
Related Rants
Have you ever thought that even today, if you had a very large "file", say 10 petabytes, that it would take 74 hours on a 300 Mb/s connection to transfer it anywhere in the world , therefore it would still be much faster to fly it physically anywhere, even with the ~5 hour time to transfer it to some sort of drive(s) at 5 gigabits a second.
undefined
doge
wow
output
file. input
much
amaze
facts
!rant
transfer
such
lel