Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
-
@arcsector looks like JS, so no: no pointers
-
@arcsector this looks like JS, but written badly
-
@Krokoklemme what the hell do you do when you want to pass a function into another function, or iterate over classes? Do you pass the class itself? The class instance itself? I dont get it... How does front-end do this shit?
-
@arcsector how tf would I know? I can't stand JS (or front-end dev, for that matter)
-
@arcsector you can use polymorphism in place of function pointers in C++. Using function pointers is considered "the C way".
I don't know jack about js. -
@electrineer i know how to do it in C and C++ which is why i was asking about js lol. I dont know squat about it! Thanks for the info though.
-
@Krokoklemme then we are in the same boat
-
@c64forthewin no no... This file has 2.3k lines, the scope is unlimited
-
@fiskolin Oh. Good luck then...
Everyone always says the previous developer was crap, sometimes you're right
This never gets old...
Exactly
I've found this beauty in our company's legacy code.
The main doubt is: is that possible have the required strength to refactoring this 💩?
rant
javascript
legacy code
train station