64
C0D4
5y

why in 2019, are browsers so fucking inconsistant.
im not even doing anything stupidly complicated.

simple UL List conataining links and background colors on the LI's....

and yet, every single browser is different, or in IE's case completly lost the plot.

Comments
  • 5
    @Alice I honestly don't know anymore.
    I just opened Firefox and thought it was close enough, checked edge and besides me being lazy with the border radius prefix, close enough.

    So I opened ie to be safe, and well, I think I need to stop now 🤷‍♂️
  • 17
    @C0D4 don't support IE anymore.

    If we neglect it long enough, maybe it'll die lmao
  • 2
    Did you use a reset css?
  • 1
    @C0D4 there's a prefix on border radius?

    ...?
  • 5
    ++ for using subtitles. 75% of the icons would be confusing without them.

    But otherwise, Edge supports border-radius without prefix, even IE does since IE9. Probably invalid markup and/or bugs in the stylesheet.
  • 1
    IE is not a browser

    It is a compatibility tool

    Stop developing for it..
  • 2
    I remember a few years ago when I would work on Web page and look o it in both Linux and Windows, same hardware and screen. Firefox on both. And the site would render differently on both. It's all messy.
  • 7
    code: black background with white symbols and text on top

    ie: white background with blue symbols and text for the whole list?

    code: no, i said black background, white symbols

    ie: oh okay, got it

    also ie: love this blue and white design, wonder who came up with it
  • 2
    Looks like its feature
  • 0
    Safari is missing in the comparison.
  • 1
    @AlgoRythm -WebKit and -moz
    although, Firefox managed withou it so 🤷‍♂️

    @Fast-Nop it should, yet it doesn't in this.

    @incognito IE, is dead, but since I was opening other browsers anyway. Doesn't hurt to see what shenanigans it was going to do.

    @lastNick who tests in Safari besides Mac users 😏
  • 1
    @C0D4 I don't know any browser that requires a prefix for border radius
  • 0
    @Alice i come from 2005 😉
  • 1
    I love how often this is voted up even though it's most probably due to @C0D4 trying to be extra compatible.

    And another thing I never get is why people use lists to make navigations. By setting list-style and everything, you can just use a bunch of divs.^^
  • 0
    @C0D4 Why testing browsers used by people who spend the most on content, devices, and software licenses?
  • 0
    @lastNick I opened IE for shits and giggles after opening Edge/Firefox.

    I didn't expect it to be "that" different.
  • 0
    Because screw u esse thats why! I think because even though we have standards for how they should work, we do not have a base implementation and everyone does whatever the fuck they want.

    Btw you got telegram?
  • 0
    @nitwhiz nope, this is @C0D4 doing nothing more then some basic css with 0 cross compatibility and opening other browsers and going... well this hasn't changed since the last time I did this without a framework.

    Also it's a List of items, so I'll use a list.
  • 0
    @AleCx04 maybe if you add an R to the end 😏
  • 1
    normalize.css
  • 0
    1. Browsers have their own default stylesheets since forever. So use normalize.css to fix that.
    2. IE11 is deprecated and dead. Develop for Edge. Whoever needs something on IE can do the same on Edge. Only exception is that you are fixing old 2000s internal software (run away! :D ). Edge is going on webkit soon so hopefully - good riddance to bad rubbish soon.
    3. Hope Apple's worst browser Safari didn't arbitrarily decide not to implement a normal feature because of "apple-is-a-snowflake" reasons.

    So yeah... 2019. Browsers are still a problem :D
  • 0
    Fuck IE.

    It’ll die once all lazy ass organizations create new platforms and applications that don’t depend on Silverlight.

    Same goes for NPAPI based applications which run on Java Applets.

    Let’s not forget FLASH ayy lmao.

    Slowly but surely!

    2,000,000 years later 💀 ⚰️
Add Comment