Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Redders9578y@ObjSal no, doctors of previous generations did exactly the same thing, they just used text books, so their process was a lot less exhaustive, and slower.
Being a doctor is a lot like being a developer, using stack overflow ten times a day is fine, it isn't about holding all the knowledge in your head, it's about knowing how to find out what you need to know, how to apply that, and when you should ask someone with more experience, or who is a specialist.
It's a doctor who doesn't look anything up who you should be more careful of! -
wlinx3048y@ThomasRedstone that's true nothing wrong with using online knowledge in general. I wouldn't mind if he was using it to confirm his diagnose or get a clue. Or even send me to someone else because he's just not sure.
But in that case guy was reading parts of texts from website to me as I should confirm is it that disease or something else maybe. Then even if he's not sure its that, just take this and this pills and come back next month lets see whats going to happen ;p
It was more like copy&paste code from somewhere and push it to production
Related Rants
When you go to a doctor and he starts to google your symptoms in front of you and reads you texts from wikipedia page of the disease he assumes you have, then writes you a prescription for some random meds.
Maybe he was a dev before.
undefined
doctor