Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
b3b343776y@toriyuno Yes I'm serious. I just wrote the final exam in college (Gymnasium, I don't know if its comparable to college) last week in IT and thats literally how they call their variables. In the exam. And they are totally serious about it. I had to convince my teacher for over half a year to just use "i" instead of something like "pacManSpielObjektImSpielfeldArrayIdx". I'm so happy to be done with school.
I've got 2 more exams to go this week and then I'm finally done with this piece of crap -
@erandria omg, how could you tell? I have the most experience in C#, and still pretty new to javascript.
-
@IntrusionCM you've inspired me to write a end-all be-all javascript framework with this style. I will name it, Plasma 🔥
-
@SHA-16384 this may or may not have been based off my deeply ingrained Win32 kernel programming experience. Just missing the return value error handling, reading magic constants from a localized resource table, and of course,
the hungarian notation >_> -
xxmicloxx546yThe only thing missing is the loop iterating to 200 while still keeping the old variable name.
-
fuckwit12186y@b3b3 ich fühle mit dir :D
If you decide to study 'Informatik' then you can finally call your variables the way you want (but they should still have a meaning though.) -
@b3b3 But then they use idx in the variable name, as if saving those 2 chars here is the real thing.
-
@norman70688 I guess I’ve never used a prototype. Makes sense, no need to instantiate an object. Time to learn about that.
I completely got let and var mixed up. Oops 😆
A+ code review
Code review my industrial strength Javascript.
rant
canonical javascript