Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
-vim-31686yThis is the sign that there’s a problem with the system that handles the password. Or that it’s old, because unicode support is standard
-
No special characters??
Even if someone doesn't want to use special characters, it should certainly be allowed.
If it is just lower and upper characters plus numbers at 6 characters there is just 58^6 possibilities. -
But why, aren't you just making more work for yourself as a developer with not accepting special chars.
Because when you hash and salt it, it does not matter right what the input was? Because you store the hash.
Or am I missing something -
@MisterArie as long as the special characters are in latin1, there should be no problem.
-
xewl41716y@Yamakuzure Why would that be. If you hash it, it'll never go outside of the hash's output scope, and most algos will stay Ascii and are valid for latin1; whatever charset you feed the algorithm.... (so, let's up that to utf-8)
-
@xewl my thoughts were more with transporting the input. (user charset versus Server charset)
Related Rants
Come ooonnn!!!
rant
security fail
password