Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
No.
You have the right to your own opinion and I couldn't care less about your opinion lol -
@vlatkozelka it's a feature, not a bug. It makes perfect sense, except for those who don't understand coercion.
http://es5.github.io/#x11.9.3 -
CatMDV10506y"Aah yes. Your Stockholm Syndrome is very nice this time of the year" -Michael, GTA V
-
@vlatkozelka well I can't agree since it's part of the specs and inherent to the nature of JS, any developer should read the specs before getting on the boat.
From my point of view it's not a good argument anymore since there are a lot of not-fcked langs targeting JS or WASM.
Still there are a lot of things that makes no sense... fucked up non-monadic implementation of Promise, async/await behavior is naive at best, most API are still callback-only, classes are a big setback, etc ... -
@karasube the fact that it's a design decision doesn't mean it's a good design decision. No one thinks this stuff is an accident
I don't hate JavaScript. Change my mind.
rant
honestlycurious