there are two kinds of people:

1. const a = () => {}
2. function a() {}

which one are you?

I prefer #2, cuz of VS Code shows a different icon when using const than when using function, and if I'm not working with my code then I'd only assume I'm dealing with a constant unless the name is clear that this is a function assigned to a constant

But all in all, I hate javascript so whatever gets my shit done lol

Whatever I need at that moment

2

window['a'] = ()=>eval(atob(...))

Mostly 1, but depends on the situation

You are comparing apples and cars

Always 1.

Mostly 2 but it depends on the situation.

based on people i know, the programmers prefer 2 and data scientists prefer 1. also those people who use functional programming may prefer 2.

These two examples are NOT the same.
Eventhough a is const, you can change it, thus possibly losing the anonymous function.

The first one is an anonymous function referenced by "a", the other is a named function.

@PonySlaystation great explaination tx

None of them. I prefere real programming languages

@wholl0p You use Python and call JS not a real language

k

@wholl0p you are ist pur garbage

@Santaclauze what?

Lambda abstractor are so hot, so...

@irene hmi? That sounds interesting. What type of languages are needed in this field?
Which languages are the most important ones in this field and why?
What made you apply there?

@irene JS at least isn't a whitespace mess.

Very much depends on usecase.

@irene you need some promises in your life

So cute how many people get mad when you call that garbage language (JS) ... "garbage"

@irene Embedded for life ♥️

@irene At the moment I'm doing about the same (Digital Current Regulator) ... RT-Linux that controls peripheral regulators... 100000 * better than web

@irene Not if you know how to use it correctly.

@irene If you use promises and callbacks correctly, you don't enter callback hell.

first because it looks nice

2