Asynchronous No. Hmmm.

@jAsE For me it is not just Javascript. To he honest, I dislike nearly every dynamically typed language....

Not in haskell...

@Phippsaurus I like you

@teganburns I made something like browser that loads xml-based .app pages that can run some c#.

@teganburns it's functionality of C# itself, called Reflection)

@vigidis yes it's personal project for myself. It's shamefull to show to others, because you can just add windows and buttons in xml-layout, basic onClick event attribute to point to method in c# code connected via script tag.

.then((doSomething=>{arfffmaybe(doSomething)).catch(console.error("jesus chris"))

Say what you will but async code is soooo much easier to write and work with in JS, I very much like Promises since they're straightforward and do what you expect them to in a pretty immutable context.

(although python's is probably even more straightforward, elegant and concise)

@woodworks I wouldn't say that python is simpler in this regards (disclaimer python isn't my strong language, so I could be wrong here). As I remember it, you'll have to start/stop threads on your own, while in JS it "just works" without thinking about threads.

@Wack true the async/await bit has some more overhead in python but I like that the control flow is simple enough that I can easily make threads and loops and run while waiting for a result, they managed to do async without the whole promise/maybe/optional jazz