241
Comments
  • 10
    This is raw infinity gold
  • 13
    Sacred image
  • 4
  • 4
    accurate . maybe next time ill show this to the client before starting to collect the requirements (maybe something like this will make them understand)
  • 7
    Sounds oddly familiar....
  • 3
    Ah, Dilbert: purveyor of uncomfortable truths since... Well whenever. Pure genius, and second only to Calvin and Hobbes in my affections
  • 4
    My previous project summarized. It was tempting to design a super generalized system to be customized later. However, I knew that this approach could never work(inner platform effect).
  • 0
    Defining clear software requirements has always been a tricky part of any project I’ve been involved in. You think everyone’s on the same page, but then halfway through, misunderstandings start to pop up. I’ve learned that the key is not just listing features but really understanding how the end user will interact with the system. That means going beyond the technical jargon and making sure the goals are clear to both developers and stakeholders. Sometimes, having an outside perspective helps a lot, especially from a team that can bridge the gap between business needs and technical execution. I recently came across a company that approaches this with a balance of creativity and precision, which made me rethink how requirements should be structured. If you’re curious about their approach, you can visit the author's site https://embrox.com/
Add Comment