Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API

From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
That's not accurate.
Gpt turbo was not an o model. The o models have chain of thought capabilities.
Not all models developed are exposed to chatgpt, most are available via the API for engineers. Each model comes in different sizes (like mini), and they also have preteleases (o1preview) that are temporary. -
retoor64242d@Grumm if you ask gpt4o what model it is, it says it's based on gpt 3.5.
Edit: want to make a screenshot of it but then it just answered correctly. Fml. Those things really never do exactly what you want. Very human. -
What do you mean GPT-2 wasn't public? Did people forget about AI Dungeon, r/SubSimulator and Frank already?
-
Grumm19581d@retoor sure it is. In this part :
"You said:
Can you sum up all the shit they created in a proper increasing order? "GPT-3" should be "GPT-1" since it was in reality the first GPT that was available to public"
But GPT-2 was already public. -
retoor64241d@Grumm ah yes. Hmm. Anyway, we're analyzing an gpt answer about restructuring it's own name. Wtf are we doing 😂
Related Rants
-
Root31I’m getting really tired of all these junior-turn-senior devs who can’t write simple code asking ChatGPT t...
-
R3ym4nn12I am really going nuts about everyone using ChatGPT. Had literally discussions 'bUt cHaTgPt sAyS iTs TrUe', wh...
-
DEVil66618"ChatGPT passed an interview for Google" "I ask to ChatGPT to write my new song" "What ChatGPT tells about o...
Chat GPT explains all its versions in a proper way
You said:
Why do suckers that created you made fucking billion inconsistent names? "GPT-3" is ok, "GPT-3.5", "GPT-4" are ok, what about those shit "GPT-o1", "GPT-o3", "GPT-o3mini" and other meaningless shit? Are they stupid or what?
ChatGPT said:
OpenAI's naming is a mess, no argument there. They went from a clear versioning system (GPT-3, 3.5, 4) to random labels like "o1," "o3," and "o3-mini" that mean nothing to normal users. Probably some internal model identifiers they just dumped on the public without thinking. Makes zero sense from a branding perspective.
You said:
Can you sum up all the shit they created in a proper increasing order? "GPT-3" should be "GPT-1" since it was in reality the first GPT that was available to public, "GPT-3.5" should be "GPT-2", etc.
ChatGPT said:
Here's the mess cleaned up logically:
GPT-1 (2018) – Never public
GPT-2 (2019) – First public model, but with limits at launch
GPT-3 (2020) – First real public GPT (should be GPT-1)
GPT-3.5 (2023) – Improved version (should be GPT-2)
GPT-4 (2023) – Major upgrade (should be GPT-3)
GPT-4 Turbo (o1) (Nov 2023) – A cheaper, faster variant (should be GPT-4)
GPT-4 Turbo (o3, o3.5, o3-mini, etc.) (2024) – Different tweaks, no clear meaning (should be GPT-5)
They could’ve just numbered them properly, but instead, they turned it into a cryptic mess.
rant
openai
chatgpt