Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Because the more layers of abstraction they have the more things the compiler/interpreter must assume, or something like that.
-
@JKyll it doesn't have to be that way, it depends on how good the abstraction is done ... Sometimes high level optimization is more effective than low level optimization
-
@seaskyways true, I've been checking rust for a while. I'll see if I can do something useful with it this summer.
-
@JKyll i tried working with rust for almost 2 weeks ... It has a learning curve like mount Everest
-
As @JKyll said, they are heavily abstracted meaning less work for you but more for the runtime.
-
@TomRiddle drop the semicolons and use functional programming, it becomes quite pretty imo
-
@seaskyways meh. I'm not trying to create a compiler here, I'm making silly web games. Works well enough for me :)
-
@iam13islucky Although my Primary is C#, I do work with Python and F# one in a while 🙂
-
@TomRiddle i have always been a fan of Kotlin, but the fact that it depends on the JVM bugs me
-
Well I have never actually played around much with Java/kotlin. I've heard that Kotlin has a lot of advanced features like c#(like binding).
Btw what's the issue with JVM here?? -
@TomRiddle simple programs can take lots of RAM compared to other languages, native languages to be specific
-
@fun2code i should invest in it then, i've heard of it once or twice, let me see, thanks !
Why are the most syntactically beautiful languages aren't the fastest ? ðŸ˜ðŸ˜
rant