Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3274b/3274b64c24289803149af173f6ef6770c13ead86" alt=""
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
retoor47972dNice try, but you should've really deleted the don't get me started part, else it was quite convincing. Sadly, you're not as smart as you think you were. I think you used original gpt and applied an obfuscstor to make it look human. Next time better.
-
retoor47972d@Lensflare I do think some human edits tho. Btw, the way we can recognize Chatgpt style content, I can recognize the hard puzzles my sudoku generator makes. I can see that it's made by my generator :p It's often hard to see, but you're like hmm, there is something familiar about this pattern.
-
retoor47972d@Lensflare I can talk about sudoku patterns for hours. To make a complex sudoku you need a combination of random and solving logic. My solver isn't the best what automatically means that my generator isn't the best but it can generate puzzles making them nearly impossible to brute force. And Bruce force is the way 99% of solvers work, it's the easiest and quite effective way for almost all puzzles. Chatgpt does generate a python script that uses brute force to solve puzzles. It solves every puzzle you get from internet, but my hard puzzle makes it crash. It shows screenshot of the process. Cool stuff huh? My solver includes brute force that it applies when desperate and if that works, the puzzle will be resolved quickly and flagged as easy. So, my puzzles are brute force rejecting by default. Also, if it can apply logic after brute forcing again, it will. My solver ain't best, but it's not bad. If it's better or worse than brute force depends on puzzle. So much research.
-
Gpt or not, the only pleasant debugging experience I had is with visual studio.
Everything else lead me to unbearable pain. -
retoor47972d@IHateFrameworks I do agree that vs studio by far has the most decent debug stuff. All other languages are capable to do the same.. I'M THEORIE :P always setup hell and stuff making me go full print statement.
Related Rants
“FINALLY… MOBILE TESTING HAS COME BACK TO SANITY!”
Let me tell you something, jabronis…
Every single day, developers all over the world sit down, open their laptops, and whisper to themselves:
"Please, Android Emulator, just work today."
But does it? NO, IT DOESN’T!
The emulator takes seven years to boot. The APK refuses to install. USB debugging fails at the worst possible time. And when you finally, FINALLY; get the app running…
“App Not Responding.”
IT DOESN’T MATTER IF YOU DEBUGGED IT!
And don’t even get me started on testers. The dev sends a build… and then they disappear! They vanish faster than your patience when Gradle decides to recompile the entire universe!
And what about stakeholders? Ohhh, don’t get me started on the stakeholders!
"Can I test it on my iPhone 6?"
"I don’t want to install anything. Just send me a YouTube link."
"Why is it not working on my Smart Fridge?"
KNOW YOUR ROLE AND SHUT YOUR MOUTH, ANDROID TESTING!
Because the future? Ohhhh, the future is here.
A world where mobile testing runs smooth as candy-ass butter, where builds are shared with a magic link, and where QA doesn’t need to borrow Karen’s phone from 2015.
And when the dust settles, when the smoke clears… there will only be one thing left standing.
A faster, easier, smarter way to test mobile apps.
devrant
android