7
atheist
11d

I just want to run your stupid tests so I can submit a PR to fix a stupid bug that has been there for ages and nobody has figured out how to fix why do I need npx to run tests in a stupid python project?! l

Comments
  • 3
    Also, fixing the bug took me less time than it did to understand how the project is set up and tested. My projects, 2 commands and everything is run. This is a rabbit hole.
  • 2
    It's also a typing problem in the standard library because the language maintainers apparently don't understand the language. Like, literally one of the maintainers said it's not possible in the current type system to fix this. I've done hardcore c++ metaprogramming. Python's generics are a toy by comparison, but it can still basically do all the same stuff. If you're crazy enough, it's actually more powerful in some cases.
  • 0
    Sad having to use npx for tests. Python unit test lib is so nice (in exception of the method naming, camelcase, weird that they've never changed it). I even have a test for my c so lib in python. They could've made it easier to run a single test in code. I do know it's possible by command line.

    It's a horrible day for devving. I degraded my project quality today. It worked so nice, all instances are load balanced together and shared data and stuff. Every F5 till be on different instance without noticing it. But I fucked up smth fundamental in protocol or so. Sockets hang. Will quit for today ffs
Add Comment