Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
				++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
				Sign Up
			Pipeless API
 
				From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
				Learn More
			Comments
		- 
				
				On the live server issue:
 Not without testing and it'd normally do selected upgrades when needed because new dependency or some security patch or the likes.
 It's always a balanced decision between having new things, bug fixes, it working correctly, having the update being tested first.
- 
				
				 Linux429868yapt-get upgrade is fine to run in prod. Linux429868yapt-get upgrade is fine to run in prod.
 apt-get dist-upgrade is not fine to run in prod.
- 
				
				I've never gotten burned running upgrade on an LTS version of Ubuntu. (except with Nvidia drivers-- totally different rant)
 
 It's good to snapshot production servers before running upgrades. Shit happens.







So our webserver teacher have been throwing around the idea that before installing anything on a Ubuntu Sever, you should run apt-get update (yes you should)
But, he also instructed everyone to run apt-get upgrade as well (in case some dependencies need to be updated)
Now for fucks sake:::::
1) apt will automatically sort out dependencies when you install a new program
2) you never ever efffing fucking wanna run apt-get upgrade on a live server. I'm not a sysadmin, but this seems like a really fucking bad idea, right?
rant
apt-get upgrade ubuntu-server