Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
moagggi7708y@myss to be honest: nevert thought about that :P yeah but it was kinda funny anyway :) but indeed that would have been more easier -- but I had no vm running, as I was on my tablet with PuTTY, due to the tablet's specs... -
moagggi7708y@davidcraven I wouldn't do that in a real live scenario, of course :) but I has clear advantages of having the ability to do some stuff at root level -
@moagggi Yes, it has. But Shared Hosting usually implies Managed Services. And that implies that I have to repair things that are broken in the system.
And that means that I'd have to fix shit users would break if they had root privileges. :D
Related Rants

Customer bought this in. They "turned on the wrong burner"
Java Joke......
I'll just tell the client it's where developers go to complain about difficult bugs in their code...
I just tested a VPS and it was kind of impressive: I just had shared hosting until now and it is a total difference when you're having full root access.
Kind of hating these greedy shared hosting fuckers now ;)
Because it was just for testing purposes, I wanted to try the mysterious command "rm -rf / --no-preserve-root".
It was working for around 5 minutes and after that literally no command worked anymore!
Not even reboot worked :P
Then I tried reboot it via the VPS panel :) End of the story: vps panel chrashed with error message: unable to start vps :P
I thought it was kind of funnny and nice to share & thanks for reading 'til here!
undefined
oops
rm -rf / --no-preserve-root
vps