Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Yes. Look at the thousands of libraries that are not reliant on any of the frameworks. Even without the frameworks, it is used all over the web.
-
It's not the frameworks that sell JavaScript, but the platform. So in effect, yes. They would just appear as a consequence.
-
@Npstr It’s not just cause JS is popular; JS has deep roots on the web. Plus, if you need to do any DOM manipulation, with good cross-browser compatibility, JS is your one and only choice. So it’s more like these frameworks can’t be built on anything else than JS. My 2cents.
-
Npstr6597y@Japorized
Not disputing that. Wasn't even meant to talk about the reasons for it, I just took the OP and switched it around ;) -
@Npstr Ah... My first instinct on that was right then 😅 But I overthought upon the comment.
Would JavaScript be such a popular language without the frameworks?
random
javascript